pbray: (Default)
Anyone who's tried to balance a day job with writing knows how hard it can be. Sometimes the impact is easy to see--working a 14 hour day makes it difficult to find the energy to write at night.

Sometimes the impact is more subtle. When I first graduated from college and started working as a programmer, I stopped writing. But as I moved up the ladder to the point where I was managing programmers rather than getting to do the fun stuff myself, I once again discovered within me the desire to write.

It took me a while to make the connection. To realize that I was a creative person, and if I couldn't satisfy my creative urges in one venue, I'd turn to another.

Fast forward to last Friday. In my new assignment at MegaCorp, I've been asked to come up with the most efficient method for processing currency adjustments. After a couple of attempts, I created a script that produces the right answers, but it takes too long to run.

By coincidence, after the early morning writing session on Friday, I'd been stuck on a plot point. Normally this would mean that throughout the day my subconscious would be working on the plot point. But instead it had been preempted by the programming challenge. When I had the "Ah ha!" moment and reached for my pen, it was not to jot down ideas for the next scene, but rather a new idea for setting limits to the data blocks being calculated.

Even after I'd gone home, and immersed myself in the story once again, it was hard to get my brain back into writing mode. The creative idea generator wanted to solve the programming problem, and I had to tell myself that it was the weekend and I would not under any circumstances allow myself to power up my laptop to work on the day job.

Fortunately the opportunities for creative coding are few and far between, otherwise this balance would be even tougher than it is. But perhaps this explains why Einstein did his best work when he was employed as a patent clerk :-)
pbray: (Default)
and eventually they add up.

This month I've rejoined [livejournal.com profile] novel_in_90 and signed up for a cancer fundraising ride in July, and my reasons for doing both are the same--I needed goals.

As I've mentioned before, ever since I began supporting the corporate finance databases, I've had trouble balancing the day job and the rest of the life. My DBA responsibilities now involve scheduled work several nights a month as well as the occasional weekend. This was prime writing time, and I found it hard to get into a writing routine, especially in the absence of an externally imposed deadline.

Similarly, this year's bike trip isn't until September. Which seems very far away, and thus I've slacked off on the training, letting myself take a pass when it was too hot/cold/wet.

But time is slipping away, unnoticed, and I realized that it was June and I had nothing to show for the past couple of months. So I gave myself goals. First, Novel in 90, which is a commitment to write at least 750 a day, every day, with the ultimate goal of 67,500 words in 90 days. It worked for me last summer when I was finishing up THE FINAL SACRIFICE, so I decided to give it another spin.

Since Saturday I've written 5,750 words. That's an entire chapter that didn't exist before. All because I was no longer waiting for the right time. I'm not even waiting for the right words. In true Nin90 spirit, I've written paragraphs that I knew were crap, just to keep moving. It's the end results that matter, words on pages. I once heard Nora Roberts tell a room full of writers "I can fix a bad page. I can't fix a blank page." I'm following her example, and so far it's working.

I know I won't get to write every day in the 90. But I'm committed to try my best, and to keep making progress. Small, manageable goals that will add up to the whole.

As for biking, rather than training for a week-long trip in September, I'm now focused on training for a 1 day ride in July. By giving myself a short term goal to work towards you can bet that I'll be out on the road this weekend, regardless of the weather.

Now if only I could figure out a way to write while biking....
pbray: (Default)
Becoming a published author involves mastering many skills, one of which is learning how to write a synopsis for your book. If you've never seen one before, this can be a daunting task, so [livejournal.com profile] jpsorrow put out a call for his friends to share examples, and declared that March 18th was S-Day.

For my part, I've posted the synopsis for THE FIRST BETRAYAL, the first volume in The Chronices of Josan series. Because this was a proposal based on sample chapters rather than a completed novel, the package included detailed background information as well as summaries for all three books in the proposed series. In order to avoid spoilers for either THE SEA CHANGE or THE FINAL SACRIFICE, I've removed those sections from the synopsis posted on my website.

At the time the synopsis was written, I has only writen the opening chapters of THE FIRST BETRAYAL. Astute readers will notice differences between the synopsis and the final book. I like to think of the published book as the "Director's Cut" of the story.

You'll also notice that many of the details in the synopsis never made it into any of three books, such as Prince Lucius's family tree, or the detailed history of the Ikarian empire. This is an example of world-building--as an author I need to know the underpinnings of the world and civilizations that I've created, but it's not necessary to explicitly include these in the story.

In his livejournal announcement [livejournal.com profile] jpsorrow refers to synopses usually being 3-5 pages in length. This is where I beg to differ--while shorter is generally better, synopses come in a wide variety of lengths, depending on the project and the author. The synopsis for THE FIRST BETRAYAL was the longest one I've ever written, mainly because it wasn't associated with a completed novel--there had to be enough detail in there to convince the folks at Bantam that I had enough story to sustain a multi-volume arc. Luckily Bantam liked it, and as you've probably guessed, they bought all three books in the series :-)

So, without further ado, click here to read my synopsis. Then take a look at the links posted below, to find more examples.

Enjoy!

Plot Synopsis Project participant links:

For more examples, check out the links below. Note, authors are posting throughout the day, some links may not be immediately available.

Edited on 3/24 to add permanent links to the blog entries.

[livejournal.com profile] desperance Chaz Brenchley's entry
Mike Brotherton's entry
Tobias Buckell's entry
[livejournal.com profile] scbutler S.C. Butler's entry
Barbara Campbell's entry
[livejournal.com profile] davidbcoe David B. Coe's entry
[livejournal.com profile] jennifer_dunne Jennifer Dunne's entry
[livejournal.com profile] sleigh S.L. Farrell's entry
[livejournal.com profile] difrancis Diana Francis's entry
[livejournal.com profile] frostokovich Gregory Frost's entry
Felix Gilman's entry
[livejournal.com profile] jimhines Jim C. Hines's entry
[livejournal.com profile] jackiekessler Jackie Kessler's entry
[livejournal.com profile] mindyklasky Mindy Klasky's entry
[livejournal.com profile] madkestrel Misty Massey's entry
[livejournal.com profile] mizkit C.E. Murphy's entry
[livejournal.com profile] naominovik Naomi Novik's entry
[livejournal.com profile] jpsorrow Joshua Palmatier's entry
Maria V. Snyder's entry Link takes you to Myspace page, then search for 03/18/08 entry
[livejournal.com profile] smokingpigeon Jennifer Stevenson's entry
[livejournal.com profile] msagara Michelle West's entry
[livejournal.com profile] ladnews Sean Williams's entry

pbray: (Default)
Describe algor mortis, livor mortis and rigor mortis.

Oh, no, wait, that's the exam I'm studying for.

Back to the topic of the day, revisions. A couple of weeks back I posted my patented process for dealing with revisions. Today I'm going to discuss the contents of a revision letter, and how I make the requested changes. Keep in mind that this is one writer's process, and not meant to imply that this is the only way, it's simply the way that works for me.

Click here if you want to read more )

And now it's time to study for my exam tomorrow. For those keeping score at home:

ALGOR MORTIS: the cooling of the body after death.

LIVOR MORTIS: the settling of blood in the lower regions of the body after death, sometimes refered to as lividity.

RIGOR MORTIS: the stiffening of the body after death. Note that maximum stiffness is achieved approximately 10-15 hours after death, and the body will remain in this state for 24-36 hours before relaxation begins.
pbray: (Default)
How to revise your novel, following the patented Bray method. Note that this method works best when performed by an experienced professional. There is no guarantee of success and the user assumes all inherent risks.

In order to complete this process, you will need the following supplies:
  • Reams of paper (enough for printing the entire novel at least five times)

  • Printer cartridges sufficient for above

  • Post-it tape flags and post-it notes

  • Chocolate

  • Alcohol

  • Friend
Click here to read more )
pbray: (crime)
Three weeks ago I turned in the manuscript for THE FINAL SACRIFICE, and since then I've been contemplating my next project. I haven't written a word in this time, but I've made notes, read research books, and picked the brains of knowledgeable folks. Gradually the project has taken shape in my mind, and earlier this week I felt I knew the characters well enough that I could begin to name them, a major milestone in my creative process.

Last night I shared this news with [livejournal.com profile] jennifer_dunne and informed her that I could almost hear the central character. His voice is coming into focus, and within the next few days I expect to start writing.

She stared at me, then repeated "You hear them?"

Yes, I told her. I have to be able to hear the characters in my head. Right now, whenever my mind is idle, it's turning over dozens of different possibilities for the opening paragraphs. All of this takes place in my head, and it's only when I can hear those opening lines clearly that I'll sit down at the computer.

She continued to stare at me, then shrugged her shoulders. "Huh. I never know what I'm going to write until I write it."

Which just goes to show that there's more than one way to be a writer. [livejournal.com profile] jennifer_dunne's process can be referred to either as organic, or as a fuzzy-headed, undisciplined mess, depending on my mood :-)

My process is different. I need to know my characters inside and out. If I can't figure out what the hero would have majored in in college, or whether or not he likes Starbucks coffee, then I'm not ready. Once the characters are in focus, the words will come.

Oddly enough when I hear the words, the voice I hear in my head is my own. It's a bit as if I'm reading aloud from a story I've already written--except, of course, that in my head there are no Errs, Umms, or mispronunciations.

I paused for a moment just now, and I can *almost* hear him--he's just around the corner, and if I wait a bit longer, he'll be here.

And then I'll begin to write.
pbray: (TSC_Cover)
Find the right names for your characters isn't an easy task. People ask me where I find my character names, and the true answer is everywhere. Over the years I've taken names from street signs, telephone directories, the town where my postcard supplier was located, alluded to genre tv shows, scoured lists of Olympic athletes, and even used the name of a popular manufacturer of plumbing fixtures.

Earlier this year I wrote about character naming, and for those who are interested I'm posting the article here under the cut.

There's something about Mary: Find the right names for your characters )
pbray: (TSC_Cover)
THE SEA CHANGE hits stores three weeks from today. If you're interested, there's an excerpt up on my website at http://www.patriciabray.com.

I'm managing to persevere despite the heat and working frantically on THE FINAL SACRIFICE, with encouragement from the folks over at [livejournal.com profile] novel_in_90.

I realized last night that the timeline in the book is hosed, so in the spirit of forward momentum I inserted a line that said
REVISION NOTE: FIX TIMELINE
and kept on writing.

You see, if Ship One leaves port and heads north at y-knots, and Ship Two leaves the same port three weeks later and heads northeast at z-knots, and meanwhile Ship One has wrecked so the passengers are now on Ship Three which is heading east....

It's actually more complicated than that, but you get the idea. I've gotten better at keeping distances straight in my head, but building in time for messages to travel back and forth is where I lost it. As I've written it now, in order for Ship Two to rendezvous with the passengers who are now on Ship Three, Ship Two needs to have left harbor before hearing the news of the wreck of Ship One. Which is a problem, since that was the motivation for their setting sail.

I'm so used to the age of instantaneous communication that I subconsciously forget that in this world, the only way to get a message across the sea is for someone to physically bring it.

It can be fixed--it's just a matter of tweaking the time references, and tinkering with the departure of Ship Two. But it means sitting down and laying out timelines, which is something I need to save for the revision stage, not the "get the damn draft down on paper" stage.

Next time I write a fantasy, there's going to be a telegraph. Or twinned chisels that carve messages in stone tablets, like very slow e-mail.
pbray: (Default)
When asked, I will tell you that I am a plan ahead writer. I write from an outline, and I have a very good idea where a story is going before I put the first words down on the page. My characters don't surprise me because I already know them better than they know themselves. Before I've finished the first three chapters of a book I already know what the ending scene of the novel will be.

Back when I was writing romances, this worked well for me. But once I switched to writing multi-volume fantasy series, reality crept in, and I had to adjust my technique.

Click here for musings on what to do when your original outline isn't working )
pbray: (TFB)
is that books one and two exist.

After I finished my daily word count yesterday, I sketched a few notes for the next chapter. I'd come up with a brilliant plot twist that would further the narrative, and add depth to the conflicts between the central characters. I congratulated myself on my brilliant insight, and forced my critique partner to listen to this great idea and make the usual "Yes, yes, you're brilliant, now could you pass the chocolate" noises.

I made more notes on the idea and outlined the scene during last night's meeting of the local romance writer's group, where I'd shown up to lend support for the mass photo shoot.

Then I went home, and slept the sleep of the just. When I woke up this morning, I realized two things a) the alarm is incredibly annoying, and b) the plot twist won't work. Lady Ysobel can't discover ShockingRevelation(tm), since she already knows this from back in book one.

Grr. Argh. It was so perfect! So lovely! And now it was doomed.

Sadly I got up and showered. Later as I was caffeinating, I realized that the twist could still be salvaged. Lady Ysobel knows ShockingRevelation(tm), but she can't convince anyone else, since on the surface it is completely absurd. This will create tension between herself and her closest ally, as well as still letting me have the big reveal, only this time from another character's POV.

Twist salvaged. Sigh of relief heard. Now off to the day job.
pbray: (Default)
Friday afternoon at Wiscon featured the midlist writers' gathering, and about a dozen of us got together to compare notes. After listening to various writers share their stories, I was hit by the realization that many of us had fallen into the secret handshake trap. )
pbray: (Default)
I'm now going to reveal one of the secrets of being a published writer™. Being a writer isn't about the money or glamour, both of which are in chronically short supply. It's not about the thrill of seeing your name in print, nor the fun of learning new things that you can incorporate in your stories.

It's not about the the fans, nor the cons, nor the joy of accomplishment when you finally finish a book.

It's all about the office supplies.

Really, you have to trust me on this one. There is no writing dilemma that can not be solved by the acquisition of the appropriate office supplies. There is no greater thrill than the freedom to go into an office supply store and buy whatever you want, secure in the knowledge that it is a legitimate business expense.

And there is no greater proof of the importance of office supplies than when it comes to the copyediting process.

Last time I posted about copyedits, I included my checklist of supplies:

At least 2 freshly sharpened green pencils
1 pencil sharpener (I will obsessively sharpen the pencils throughout the process)
1 artist's eraser
1 pad of small Post-it notes or tape flags
Scrap paper or notepad
Reference sheet of CE symbols & abbreviations
Caffeine, chocolate and alcohol

But I forgot to highlight the most important supply of all: transparent Post-it tape flags, the kind that can be written on.

As I make my first pass through the manuscript, each time I find a correction I want to make, I mark the place with a transparent tape flag and write the correction on the flag.

When I'm ready for the final pass (which usually involves a suitable cooling off period), I go through each page and either copy the correction onto the manuscript itself, or decide that it wasn't necessary. The tape flag acts as a pressure release valve. Before I found these, I would sometimes make a correction on the manuscript, then wind up erasing it later. This way I only write on the manuscript after I've made my final decision.

Office supplies--is there nothing they can't do?

If you'd like to know more about what's involved in the copyediting process from an author's side, click here to read my previous post on the subject.

ETA This entry is a spam magnet, so I've turned off comments.
pbray: (Josan)
A few days ago, I mentioned the difficulties involved in writing certain scenes. [livejournal.com profile] sylvia_rachel asked if I'd mind describing my process, so for those who care, it's behind the cut.

This is how Patricia writes the dark & scary shit. )
pbray: (Default)
Last night I woke abruptly from a dream in which I was reading the revision letter for the manuscript I'd sent in earlier this month. In the letter, my editor gently pointed out that I'd inserted a huge chunk of fanfic in the middle of the book, and I should be prepared to cut that section. She didn't think that we could get licensing rights for that property--particularly since I'd killed off one of their main characters.

I called my editor to discuss and informed her that the character in question NEEDED TO DIE. The ever-patient Anne agreed, and then pointed out, once again, the issue of licensing.

I awoke half-convinced that I had indeed received that revision letter and it took a while for me to realize that it was all part of a dream. When the heavy plow came down the road on its second pass, I realized that this was probably what had originally awoken me.

I can't remember which TV show the dream referenced--it might have been Heroes or CSI. But I'm pretty darn sure that there isn't a chunk of fanfic in the manuscript I sent, and I know I haven't killed off anyone else's characters. Despite how much they need to die.

I suppose it just goes to show what the mind will come up with when it's fretting. There's nothing quite like that awful silence between the time you deliver a manuscript and the time you get your first feedback--especially when it's a project where you're not sure if it worked or not. It's a bit like that moment where you slam into an obstacle and you're waiting for the pain to register to figure out how badly you're hurt. Now just imagine that moment stretching out for weeks....

Optimism. It's for other people.
pbray: (Default)
In preparation for their upcoming annual conference, yesterday I went to the romance writer's bi-annual writing retreat, where [livejournal.com profile] jennifer_dunne and I gave our patented "How to pitch to an agent/editor" presentation, with Jennifer taking the role of hopeful author and I was the jet-lagged editor/agent-in-search-of-bar.

A couple folks who were just back from RWA National shared their stories of how their agent/editor appointments went, and this is the point where heartburn set in. One writer had multiple requests to see her manuscript, but wasn't sure if she was going to send it out. She'd heard a number of people saying that the market for that genre was weak, and in her mind this was reason enough not to bother trying. Plus one of the editors she spoke to is from Harlequin UK so she'd have the expense of mailing the manuscript to England. I bit my tongue rather than point out that she'd just dropped at least a thousand dollars to go to National, and now she's quibbling over a few bucks in postage.

Another writer had an agent request to see her work, but the agent wasn't wildly enthusiastic. She'd cut the writer's pitch short, not letting her finish her spiel before asking to see it. I would have taken this as a positive sign but this writer has decided if the agent wasn't in love with the verbal pitch then there's no chance she'll like the manuscript, so why bother?

In both cases the writers said they were considering submitting their manuscripts, eventually, but in reality they were just trolling for more excuses to put it off. I've no doubt that if I check in with these folks at the annual Christmas party I'll learn that both of them have allowed these opportunities to slip through their fingers.

Shame of the matter is that at least one of these women is a very talented writer. But after encouraging her for several years to start submitting her work, I've given up. It looks like she'll remain firmly on the professional virgin side, every now and then sending out a query or meeting with an agent, but never actually taking the emotional risk of incurring one rejection after another until she succeeds.

I firmly believe that the difference between myself and these women isn't a matter of skill so much as it is that I endured two years of rejections, and have the thick stack of rejection letters to prove it. Being a writer is as much about picking yourself up off the mat and trying again as it is about the ability to craft wonderful stories.

And if you happen to stumble across this and recognize yourself, please be angry. Go ahead and prove me wrong by sending your manuscript out. Whatever happens next, whether it's a rejection letter or an acceptance, I promise to be the first to hand you chocolates and buy you a drink.

PSA

Apr. 20th, 2006 09:28 pm
pbray: (Default)
Following the meme that's being passed around, a few public service links for anyone considering submitting their work to an agent.

First, repeat after me. "Money flows from the agent to the author." If an agent suggests that you need to pay them up front, walk away. Trust me, you're better off without them.

Now for the links.

A Who's Who list dredged from the bottom of the barrel Writer Beware's list of the twenty worst agents.

Preditors & Editors listing of agents (pay particular attention to the "Not Recommended" flags).

Association of Authors' Representatives. AAR members must subscribe to a canon of ethics and have a track record of sales. A good place to start your agent search.
pbray: (Default)
After reading everyone else's 10 Things list, I decided to give in to my inner lemming and post one of my own.

10 Things I Know About Writing

Warning: the following advice has not been proven to be generally safe and effective. As with all writing advice, use at your own risk, under the supervision of a professional. Your individual mileage may vary.

1) Your book is never as good as you think it is.

2) It's also never as bad as you think it is.

3) It is good to have a routine for writing.

4) Except, of course, when it's not.

5) Being with other writers is energizing.

6) Comparing yourself to other writers can only lead to unhappiness, as there will always be others who are more successful (however you define this) than you are.

7) It is good to have a career plan.

8) Having a career plan does not mean that you are in control of your career. There are too many variables outside your control that can alter your career path for good or ill.

9) The longer you've been in the business, the more you know. I am constantly learning new things about writing and being a succesful author.

10) Anyone who tells you they know the one true secret to being a sucessful writer is deluded, angling for you to buy them a drink in the bar, or both.
pbray: (Default)
On this date in 44 BCE, Julius Caesar was assassinated. Give credit to William Shakespeare for the fact that anyone remembers the month and day of his death.

FWIW, the "Ides of March" was a phrase that had special significance for Americans during those years when their income taxes were due on March 15th, providing everyone with the obvious death and taxes jokes. Sadly in the 1950s the due date was changed to April 15th, and thus comedians had to start searching for their own material.

For those who haven't seen it, [livejournal.com profile] alg has a great post on publishing as a business.

Some of the advice may seem obvious, such as "Act like an adult" and "Do your homework" but it's sad to say that many writers miss these obvious steps and need to have them spelled out.

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags