pbray: (Default)
[personal profile] pbray
The creators of the 1992 Buffy the Vampire Slayer movie have apparently decided to relaunch the franchise with a new Buffy movie. Without the involvement of Joss Whedon or any of the cast from the TV series.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mevennen.livejournal.com
Um. In the department of 'bad ideas I have heard today', that rates really quite highly.

What are they thinking?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com
That pretty much sums up the reaction of almost everyone.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mizkit.livejournal.com
I have to assume they think they're going to pull in everybody who knows the name Buffy the Vampire Slayer as an abstract concept but don't know anything about the show, its creators, or actors. I suspect there are a lot of them. But certainly every indication is that the actual *fans* would be staying away in droves....

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com
And also every reason to believe fans of the show--who are highly organized and lavish in their devotion to Whedon and the TV series--will take umbrage and do their best to make everyone aware that this new movie is a very bad thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
It's a guess that they are sick and tired of hearing about how they ruined Whedon's original premise, and are going to prove they can Do It Without Him.

Ego is a wonderful thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 05:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com
Not to mention "Hey, anything with a vampire is big bucks and we've got the rights to this, so..."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
I think you have a BINGO!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jtglover.livejournal.com
I saw that. I think they're basically figuring that, with Whedon's massive failure to attract a popular audience, really they ought to give the range to a tyro who connects with both genre and youth audiences. That's the rumor I heard from the board's meeting, anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 06:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com
Will be interesting to see what happens.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scbutler.livejournal.com
3 to 2 it never happens.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com
I wouldn't bet against it. After all, they're making a sequel to WANTED (last summer's movie that featured a bullets that turned corners).

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 10:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scbutler.livejournal.com
Yeah, but the outcry is going to be deafening.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 09:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jjschwabach.livejournal.com
This is henceforth to be referred to as BuffyFAIL.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-27 11:45 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-28 09:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jemck.livejournal.com
whiskey tango foxtrot indeed.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-05-29 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sylvia-rachel.livejournal.com
Well, I can put that one on my Movies I Needn't Worry About Bothering To See list, then ... :^P

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags