Circumstantial evidence
Dec. 22nd, 2008 01:40 pmWhen police in Finland found a mosquito inside a stolen car, they decided to analyze the blood found in the mosquito and used the DNA results to identify the suspect. The suspect, who has a record, is claiming that he simply hitched a ride in the vehicle.
The prosecutor must now decided if this evidence is strong enough to press charges.
Fingerprints on the steering wheel are one thing, but I think they're going to have a hard time making a case if all they have to go on is the mosquito. Though it does add something else to your forensics checklist when preparing to commit a crime.
Wearing gloves and a disguise is so passe. These days your preparations should include removing all body hair (or wearing a tyvek suit), bringing along bleach for destroying any trace DNA, making sure your cell phone is powered off and left home so it can't be used to track your movements, being aware of all traffic cameras and other monitoring devices as you travel to/from crime scene, and, oh yes slathering yourself in DEET to avoid incriminating mosquito evidence.
The prosecutor must now decided if this evidence is strong enough to press charges.
Fingerprints on the steering wheel are one thing, but I think they're going to have a hard time making a case if all they have to go on is the mosquito. Though it does add something else to your forensics checklist when preparing to commit a crime.
Wearing gloves and a disguise is so passe. These days your preparations should include removing all body hair (or wearing a tyvek suit), bringing along bleach for destroying any trace DNA, making sure your cell phone is powered off and left home so it can't be used to track your movements, being aware of all traffic cameras and other monitoring devices as you travel to/from crime scene, and, oh yes slathering yourself in DEET to avoid incriminating mosquito evidence.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 07:53 pm (UTC)I just want to know the reaction of the DNA techs when they received the mosquito as evidence.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 07:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 07:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 07:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 08:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 08:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-23 01:47 am (UTC)(BBC story (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7795725.stm))
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-23 03:22 am (UTC)Another case where simply being present wasn't enough to prove involvement in a crime.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 07:58 pm (UTC)If the Finnish authorities are prepared to pay for DNA analysis to catch car thieves, I'm guessing they've not got a lot of open homicide investigations. Which is great, of course ... but somebody over there obviously has way too much free time to watch CSI on satellite.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 08:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 08:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 10:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 10:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-22 10:56 pm (UTC)Um.... even if the mosquito also had the *victim's* blood inside it, all that would prove was that it had bitten both of them. That wouldn't even require placing him at the scene. 'Cause the thing about mosquitoes, see, is they can fly.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-23 01:49 am (UTC)I see a business opportunity in these troubled economic times.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-23 03:24 am (UTC)Or very little thought, and committing your crime in an area where the local constabulary has little experience in violent crimes, in which case the odds that they'll muck up the scene and the evidence are fairly high.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-12-23 10:54 pm (UTC)