pbray: (writer)
pbray ([personal profile] pbray) wrote2005-09-12 04:31 pm

Formatting, grammar, spellcheck

Lesson One. How to shoot yourself in the foot, before you even get it in the door.

Standard manuscript format is important. The overall basics are:
- Bright white paper
- 1 inch margins all around
- Double-spaced
- 12 point Courier (preferred) or 12 point Times New Roman font

Yes, Courier is a boring font, and Times New Roman isn't much better. But these fonts are readable, and in particular Courier works well for those involved in the editing and production stages of the manuscript.

When you send in your manuscript printed in Brush Script on scented purple paper, you are not making your manuscript stand out from the pack. Instead you are sending the signal that you don't understand the industry, or worse that you do understand the rules but have decided that they don't apply to you. In either case, the editor/agent will take away the impression that you are going to be difficult to work with. These are busy people with lots of demands on their time. If your manuscript is hard for them to read, then they won't bother.

Once they've started reading, you need to keep them reading. This is where spelling and grammar come in. When the reader encounters a misspelled word, it can jerk them out of the story as they pause to try and decide what the author meant to say. Just running spellcheck isn't enough-- spellcheck won't catch the difference between who's and whose, their or there, or allusion versus illusion. Run spellcheck, then carefully edit your manuscript before running spellcheck a final time to make sure you haven't introduced new errors. Frequent spelling errors are a sign of a sloppy author, or someone who doesn't care enough about their story to invest the time needed to clean it up.

The same goes for grammar. Poor grammar is a red-flag for "this author doesn't know her craft" and can often prevent the reader from following the storyline. Only your mother or best friend are going to take the time to struggle through your bad grammar to try and figure out what you meant to say. An editor or agent is simply going to toss your manuscript aside.

To explain it in a different way, it doesn't matter if you're the next Stephen King or Nora Roberts. No one is going to discover your talent if you can't convince them to read your story. Give yourself the best chance possible by taking care of the details so your manuscript makes a good first impression. Format, spelling, grammar should all be clean so there's nothing to distract from your writing.


Tomorrow, I'll talk about starting your story.

[identity profile] jennifer-dunne.livejournal.com 2005-09-12 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
If you find Courier New too thin and spindly to read, download the font Dark Courier. It looks like the old Courier font, nice and dark and solid, but still monospace. It's available for free from HP at: http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?locBasepartNum=lj611en&lang=English+%28US%29

[identity profile] storytellersjem.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks!

[identity profile] lostsilmaril.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
What about left-justified, with a minimum of page number on each page, and potentially more. (short title of work, for example. Project / page# or Lastname/project/page#) ( someplace unobtrusive, of course.)

I suppose left-justified goes without saying for courier, (At least, it should--I don't know if MS Word lets you double-justify what should be a monospaced font.) But the issue could pop up with Times New Roman.

[identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Good point. Naturally writers should follow the complete manuscript conventions, which include left justification, as well as placing your title, name and page numbers appropriately. I should probably add this to the post.

But you wouldn't believe how many people miss the basics-- people who think that printing each chapter on a different color of paper lets the editor see how creative they are, or who insist that the beauty of a font is far more important than its readability.

And we won't even mention those people who think that packing a surprise in the box is the way to grab an editor's attention....

[identity profile] fancythat2.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
Readability is everything! I see bad adverts (and other publicly displayed things) all over the place that forget this.

"And we won't even mention those people who think that packing a surprise in the box is the way to grab an editor's attention...."

My brain supplied this mental picture: Opens MS box. The editor shrieks, "Snake!" and flings the box across the room at high velocity. Silly brain.

[identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 01:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually I'm sure that's happened. I know of at least one editor who opened a manuscript box to find lifelike plastic spiders packed along with the submission. Another received a box where the author had added chocolate, which then melted all over the manuscript rendering it unreadable.

Editors and agents tell many stories of the bizarre submissions they've received, but I've noticed that none of these ever start with "When I saw the box shaped like a miniature coffin and the vial of holy water inside, I knew I had to read this author's story immediately and make them an offer."

(Anonymous) 2005-09-13 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Shakes head. I'd be happy to learn that my neat, clean, and plain MS survived the mail without becoming rumpled or soiled.

[identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
And that makes you a professional, and already one step up the ladder ahead of the clowns.

[identity profile] fancythat2.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
: )

[identity profile] jennifer-dunne.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, the best thing I've ever found for this is the plastic pouches they sell in office supply stores... Image Smead Inn Dura top-opening translucent envelopes hold 200 pages. You can squeak a full manuscript into it, if you're careful.

The pages don't move around, and don't get the ink smeared on them from the tyvek envelope they're sent in, and don't get that dented/ripped thing from a too-tight rubber band. Plus, unlike binder clips, in my experience these stay with the submission, and are usually returned (MUCH the worse for wear) by the editor/agent.

[identity profile] fancythat2.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Would the editor/agent find that acceptable from a newbie author?

"tyvek envelope"?? I thought the manuscript went lose and bare (that sounded terrible) into a Manuscript box.

Hmmm...Could you two add a How to Package Your Manuscript segment?

[identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
If you are sending in a partial manuscript (usually three chapters and a synopsis) it's too small for a manuscript box and thus putting it in the plastic folder and tucking that into a Priority Mail (tyvek) envelope is the way to go.

When I was submitting shorter works (65-75,000 words) I sent them priority mail either bound by a single rubber band, or inserted into a plastic folder and then put in the envelope.

Now that my manuscripts run over 400 pages, I mail the manuscript in a box. You can buy boxes at office supply stores, but I've found recycled Amazon.com book boxes are usually the perfect size.

[identity profile] fancythat2.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Aaah. Light bulb on, thank you.

Does it help to send your manuscript in a smiling box? : )

What about double sided printing?

[identity profile] ellen-denham.livejournal.com 2005-09-14 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
When I print out drafts for myself or my readers, I always do them double sided just to save paper and not have so much to lug around. But what is the consensus about doing this for editors? My assumption would be just stick to single-sided to be on the safe side, but a thick novel will certainly will make less of a doorstop if printed double sided.

Re: What about double sided printing?

[identity profile] fancythat2.livejournal.com 2005-09-15 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not published but...
Everything I have run across about submitting your manuscript says NO to double sided printing.

Re: What about double sided printing?

(Anonymous) 2005-09-15 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Single-sided only if you are submitting to editors and agents. Double-sided is just too difficult to work with from a production standpoint so it's simply not used. Don't worry about the doorstop effect, since every other novel is also doorstop length this is what they are expecting and they aren't going to count it against you.

[identity profile] jennifer-dunne.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, and, it probably goes without saying that individual editorial preferences override general recommendations. So if you're sending something to a publisher who requests 14-point daisy-chain font, 2" margins, and all text centered... that's what you send. Well, as soon as you find a copy of the daisy-chain font, that is. :-)

Personally, I tend to use Book Antiqua, because that's what my primary publisher wants. And if someone takes electronic submissions, that's what they get. If they only take printed submissions, I'll convert to courier before printing.

[identity profile] fancythat2.livejournal.com 2005-09-13 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Ooh, synchronous moment. (I have senior moments more often) : ).

Grammar

[identity profile] fancythat2.livejournal.com 2005-09-15 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Yonks ago, I was taught to use two spaces between sentences, but I hear that has changed to one space to cut down on the 'rivers' running through the page. In proper manuscript format, should I be using one space between sentences?

Re: Grammar

[identity profile] pbray.livejournal.com 2005-09-16 01:13 pm (UTC)(link)
This is dealer's choice.

Way back when I was learning how to type on actual honest to god typewriters, we were taught two spaces after the period. This was the accepted convention, because when working with a monospaced typewriter font the two spaces made the sentence break clear and improved readability. Those of us who graduated from typewriters to wordprocessors continue to automatically add two spaces after a period.

But in a printed book that is in a proportional font, you don't need the extra space to clarify the end of the sentence. So printed books took the extra space out.

Once wordprocessors and proportional fonts became common, students were no longer taught to add the extra space. Now manuals of style state that one space is preferred, although most also note that in American usage two spaces is still acceptable.

Bottom line, if you are submitting a paper manuscript, you can use either one or two spaces. Just be consistent. My personal preference is for two, especially if you're using Courier (a monospace font).

If you are submitting to an e-publisher, check their style guidelines to see if they require one space. If they don't specify a house style, then again it's up to you.

Re: Grammar

[identity profile] fancythat2.livejournal.com 2005-09-16 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
"Bottom line, if you are submitting a paper manuscript, you can use either one or two spaces. Just be consistent."

Oh good. That is one little thing I won't have to relearn. : )
Thanks.